Child sexual abuse victims hit doubly hard by legal aid cuts

Victims of child sexual abuse are being hit doubly hard by the O’Farrell government with proposed cuts to victims compensation being followed by the complete removal of all legal aid entitlements for civil claims by victims of child sexual abuse against either the Church or the State government.

As reported by the ABC Online | Statement from Legal Aid below

Justice for Victims Square #2Greens MP and Justice Spokesperson David Shoebridge said:

“Legal Aid have said that with the Federal Royal Commission into child abuse starting they anticipate receiving a large number of victims of institutional child abuse to come forward and seek damages.

“Astoundingly Legal Aid has decided that because there will be a large number of survivors of abuse seeking justice, for this reason they will be denying every one of them legal aid.

“This is a terrible betrayal of victims of abuse.

“Cutting Legal Aid support for victims of abuse will only assist the powerful institutions that abused children in the past.

“This is a gift for the Catholic Church and those state authorities that failed to protect children in the first place.

“As more survivors come forward, many living in poverty due to the ongoing impact of their abuse, Legal Aid should be directing more funds to support them, not less.

“The Premier has said he is concerned about the legacy of child abuse but with his proposed savage cuts to victims compensation and the complete denial of Legal Aid his government has shown that their concern is only paper thin.

“Survivors of abuse deserve more from their government than hollow words.

“Decency demands that the Government immediately reverse these cuts against some of the most vulnerable members of our community,” Mr Shoebridge said.

 

Statement from Legal Aid

Civil Law Policies – Available funds

Taking into consideration its available funds and competing priorities, Legal Aid NSW has determined that until further notice funds are not available for the following civil law matters:

“Breach of civil liberties” matters that fall within the scope of the inquiry being undertaken by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse or civil litigation proceedings arising from matters that are related to the Royal Commission inquiry.

State matters that fall within the scope of the “at special disadvantage” policy.

Background

Royal Commission matters

Under Policy 6.6.1, legal aid is available for matters where there has been a breach of the legal aid applicant’s civil liberties. This may include matters where the applicant has been assaulted by a person in a special position of authority. For legal aid to be granted in these types of matters applicants must meet the Legal Aid NSW Means Test, Merit Test A and Availability of Funds Test.

With the commencement of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Legal Aid NSW anticipates it will receive a large number of applications from clients seeking damages under Policy 6.6.1 for abuse that occurred in institutional care. These matters have the potential to incur significant expenditure that will have a disproportionate impact on the limited civil law budget.

Legal Aid NSW has therefore decided that funds are not available in such matters until further notice.

, ,

4 Responses to Child sexual abuse victims hit doubly hard by legal aid cuts

  1. Jennifer Herrick May 20, 2013 at 10:42 am #

    I am astounded. I thought Barry O’Farrell was a decent individual.

  2. Michelle May 20, 2013 at 12:09 pm #

    David, your comment in the media

    “This is a free pass for the Catholic Church and those other institutions that have abused children,” he said.

    Is showing your bias. If you name one institution you name them all. Most of this is about the State run institutions that still have seriously systemic problems with abuse.

    If you really are concerned about abuse, then start working on changing the current systems in the State run institutions and for state wards. It is still happening here David.

    • Jennifer Herrick May 20, 2013 at 6:59 pm #

      If caring about abuse from the chief offender is bias so be it Michelle, and Michelle you too have your bias. Lets all join out biases together and seek proper attendance to this terrible scenario rather than critisising one against the other when we all want the Government and the Offenders to make an effort to truly understand what victims and survivors live with on a daily basis. Give David support not negative criticism. God knows he needs it does he not?

      • Michelle May 21, 2013 at 1:27 pm #

        I don’t have bias actually. It has happened in my own family and I have spent years trying to understand how and why this could happen. The chief offenders of paedophilia are in fact male family members, that’s a fact. Unfortunately, this is not being investigated. I would like to see politicians represent the rest of us who have been sadly left out of this entire enquiry. We need support too! There is however, no-one interested enough at present, it is all about institutions and money.